<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The SalesAssessment Blog &#187; Revenue growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/category/revenue-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salesassessmentblog.com</link>
	<description>:: Words of sales test wisdom from those who know ::</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 16:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is online assessment too time consuming?</title>
		<link>http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/2010/04/is-online-assessment-too-time-consuming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/2010/04/is-online-assessment-too-time-consuming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>shekharv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring top performers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revenue growth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It takes around 2 ½ hours to complete an online assessment – and both sales people and sales managers alike have told me that this is too long. However, the alternatives can be even more time consuming or render a result that is more ‘horoscope and hope’ than objective assessment. Gaining insight by observing sales [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes around 2 ½ hours to complete an online assessment – and both sales people and sales managers alike have told me that this is too long. However, the alternatives can be even more time consuming or render a result that is more ‘horoscope and hope’ than objective assessment. Gaining insight by observing sales meetings or listening in on sales calls is not enough. Even coupled with measuring KPIs, the picture you get may not be enough to make good recruitment or training decisions.</p>
<p> Time consuming but accurate is assessment based on observation. First, you need to define the selling role and develop the list of skills that you want to observe. These should be weighted by importance since not all skills contribute equally to the success of the role. Next, train your observers to avoid falling into the trap of only looking for evidence that supports a view they already have of the sales person. Schedule sales meetings or role-plays where you observe. Try to screen out the effect on the assessment of the subject knowing they are being observed. Finally, decide on a benchmark that defines what good looks like. This approach means spending a lot of time upfront in preparation and is costly for the sales manager who has to observe the sales person at meetings. The result can be robust and objective but does not yield much better information than using the right online assessment and takes hours in the making and hours in the doing. Two and a half hours seems quite short in comparison.</p>
<p> What if you want to test for a future role? Consider a sales person who wanted advancement to a sales manager role. He was very good in his sales role and if his employer hadn’t been willing to promote him he would probably have gone elsewhere. (Of course, if he had been put in the wrong role they would have lost him anyway.) An assessment centre would have helped, but for a single individual it was inappropriate. However, using an online assessment he was tested in the sales manager role and also in a new senior selling role. The tests revealed that he had potential as a sales manager and would probably be adequate in the role, but in the senior selling role he could excel. The boss didn’t have to persuade him to make the right choice – he himself elected to step up to the senior sales role. The boss was able to provide a focused development plan built around behaviours and competence that enabled the individual to fulfil their promise of excellent results and the whole process took 4 hours including feedback time.</p>
<p> So it seems in trying to improve your sales results you can either trust to a horoscope and hope approach, develop a full assessment centre or spend 2 ½ hours online with an assessment that is robust, objective, immediate and above all accessible by the sales person and the sales manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/2010/04/is-online-assessment-too-time-consuming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the point of assessing sales people?</title>
		<link>http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/2009/04/whats-the-point-of-assessing-sales-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/2009/04/whats-the-point-of-assessing-sales-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Dugdale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hiring top performers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revenue growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competitive advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales wins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win more business]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/2009/04/whats-the-point-of-assessing-sales-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an expert in assessing sales people I get asked this very often. The answer is simple. If your team is not populated with top performing sales people &#8211; you will get outsold! That means at best you need more prospects per sale, with all the costs that incurs; or worst case &#8211; if your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_70" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-70" title="Andrew Dugdale" src="http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/ad-head-shot-cropped-300x199.jpg" alt="CEO SalesAssessment.com" width="300" height="199" /><p class="wp-caption-text">CEO SalesAssessment.com</p></div>
<p>As an expert in assessing sales people I get asked this very often. The answer is simple.</p>
<p>If your team is not populated with top performing sales people &#8211; you will get outsold! That means at best you need more prospects per sale, with all the costs that incurs; or worst case &#8211; if your competitor has people who are a league better that yours, maybe you never win another deal.</p>
<p>Reality for most companies probably lies today somewhere in between these two extremes &#8211; pipelines slipping worse than ever; sales &#8216;disappearing&#8217; at a higher rate than ever; win ratios becoming progressively worse; costs increasing&#8230;. yes, we are all familiar with this scenario by now. So what can be done to reverse this?</p>
<p>Just cloning your top performers, assuming you can achieve this without a rigorous assessment tool, is no longer enough. Think about this &#8211; what if your top performer is just not good enough to outsell those sales people in all the new competition springing up everyday. What if the skills required today to be a top performer have changed &#8211; and in most areas they have! Customer expectations are changing faster than the skill sets in most sales forces &#8211; but it needn&#8217;t be so.</p>
<p>The value of SalesAssessment.com&#8217;s Fit-4 offering is that it uniquely measures the 4 key areas that determine a sales person&#8217;s ability to create revenue, not generically, but for the specific role they are required to perform. Even better, all 4 areas are benchmarked against world class top performers. This means that uniquely with Fit-4, you are dramatically reducing the risk of being outsold by your competition; and since we are continuously aligning the benchmarks as the needs of the market changes, you can be sure that you will always have a team of top performing sales people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salesassessmentblog.com/2009/04/whats-the-point-of-assessing-sales-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
